[iDC] iDC Digest, Vol 50, Issue 13
Paul Prueitt
psp at ontologystream.com
Wed Jan 21 19:28:47 UTC 2009
I would like to enter into this valued discussion, and to work to
advance an understanding of the issue between architecture and
content. A larger context might be the balance between supply and
demand, centralization and decentralization; and the hidden and
visible hand in economics.
On Jan 21, 2009, at 12:42 PM, idc-request at mailman.thing.net wrote:
> The problem is, and I think this is also what Michael is proposing,
> the economic, cultural and political value of the force of such
> collective content production upon networked architecture is neither
> valued nor measured by Google (although it is certainly stored and
> accumulated for future ventures). Google's epistemo-political sleight
> of hand is to help remap the knowledge economy as a division of labour
> between 'architecture' vs. content, with architecture the province of
> the post-fordist corporation and content 'free' for everyone else to
> produce. It is this 'dispositif' that requires rigorous criticism.
My work, and work of a few colleagues is focused on the development
of a decentralization of design and thus a decontrol over both
context and design ( a component of architecture).
I offer the following short essay for discussion. This discussion if
allowed would help me and my colleagues with the language we need to
advance a new approach.
Two Hands that Clap Together
The Second School, January 2009
www.secondschool.net
A critical missing “public” Internet infrastructure will provide
capabilities necessary to monetize content that in our communication
medium is properly considered “private”. Two hands, hidden and
visible, must work together. The missing infrastructure is proposed
as an open, but protected communication medium.
A sub-stratum based generative architecture is the technological
underpinning for infrastructure based on contextualizing the public
activities of communities of practice. Contextualization is
preformed via a small set of formal mechanisms. A particular user or
set of users participates through disclosure of property claims and a
strong form of selective transparency. A legal basis for such
contextualization is available. For example, patent disclosure and
transparency on patent ownership is derived form the U.S.
Constitution. In a similar way decentralized generative mechanisms
are grounded in principles of free market democracy. A community
actively mediates ownership and services use within a circumstantial
setting. The control over these mechanisms is decentralized and yet
constrained by a visible hand. The visible hand is instrumented via
everywhere present micromachines. Immediate and provable
transparency on these machines protects the individual rights and
insures public value.
With a sub-stratum based generative architecture, micromachines
automate design. Each micromachine is expressed in a sub-stratum
interface language. These languages use a small set of semantic
primitives and corresponding binary encoding structure to provide
executable process designs and content. Automation of design
provides the higher level of expression required to observe and
control very complex systems. Micromachine meta-components provide
the intrinsic security and DRM (Digital Rights Management) required
for IP Exchange automation.
As coined by Dr. Jonathan Zittrain in 2008, a “generative technology”
allows each consumer to become a participant: to change technologies
for themselves or to adopt improvements offered by others. A balance
is achieved between open source and proprietary software models.
This new model is called Designed Source and is “open and protected”.
Executable design patterns: The Cubicon architecture is based on
hierarchically nested, executable design patterns. So once a context
specification has been created, the behavioral operations it defines
may be immediately incorporated into the marketplace. The means
through which this occurs is called genealogy over a set of elemental
transactions. Using genealogy, a design pattern is always a
combinatory expression of a finite set of atomic transaction elements
maintained in a community based generative structure. The elements
of the “gene” pool are linked to replicator mechanisms so as to
provide agile expression, in much the same way as human speech is
generated from a set of phonemes.
By using the rules of a generative interface language, analytic
agents may be developed by third parties and monetized through the IP
Exchange along with content and services. This automation means that
domain expert judgments from around the globe may be leveraged
without creating a large centralized software development organization.
A user’s reference may embed concepts that add value to their email
and other document resources. The generative technology allows deep
analytic encodings based on transclusion, a set of micro-mechanisms,
which lets a document include sections of other documents by
reference. The “external markup” strategy allows multiple encodings
to overlay the text and those encodings remain intact even when the
source document is edited. Such automation is just not practical
with conventional mark-up technologies.
Markets of all types need a visible hand of regulations enabled by
law and well-specified micro-mechanisms. Transclusion manages the
nested enfolding of information that may have intellectual property
restrictions and empowers a visible hand of regulation. When
combined with deep packet inspection and atomic transaction memory,
transclusion enable efficient processor use and agile real time design.
This convergence of Web pages and application windows gives a user/
developer the ability to monetize an application as a native service
offered on a micro-payment basis. This capability provides a visible
hand to a design process market.
paul
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.thing.net/pipermail/idc/attachments/20090121/00c88dfe/attachment-0001.htm
More information about the iDC
mailing list