[iDC] A Modest Proposal: Let's get rid of the teachers

Wed Feb 18 20:59:43 UTC 2009

Hi Mark + fellow idcers,

What you term _link jockeys_ I term _versionals_:

"Institutionalised information facets that are currently viewed as "factual"
are not immune to the versional effect. Canonized distributions embodying
previously established credibility markers such as scientific
methodology>evidence>history-as-truth are being repulsed to encourage more
elastic variations on present non-credible information sources like
Wikipedia, who draw on constantly changing data sources. Versionals, being
post-[singular]identities, act to obfuscate regular information hierarchies
and rewrite "credible" information source-points via blogging, wiki
creation, photo aggregationism, p2p file sharing, textual moment-capture and
info-flagging [microblogging, instant messaging, tagging, social
bookmarking], video snippeting, and identity diffusion. Versionals are the
new cultural black."

[ http://www.furtherfield.org/displayreview.php?review_id=281 ]

Chunks,
Mez

On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Mark Marino <markcmarino at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi, IDC-ers:
>
> Please consider the proposal below in the spirit in which it was
> intended...
>
> Today, sitting in a left-handed chair-desk in a mandatory writing
> class, with a not-so-mandatory technology component, I asked my
> students: Do we really need libraries and librarians in the age of Web
> 2.0?
>
> One replied: Couldn't we ask the same thing about everyone? Even teachers?
>
> (collective gasp from students)
>
> Well, why not?
>
> What if we just got rid of teachers, the way we've gotten rid of
> journalists and books, VCRs and retirement funds?  Let's follow open
> content to its natural conclusion...
>
> Instead of that Web 1.0-notion of professors and Instructors, we could
> have Link Jockeys
>
> Chronicle Job Description:
>             Wanted: NTT Link Jockeys.  Instead of teaching classes,
> delivering lectures, and creating wicked midterm essay questions, we
> seek Link Jockeys (or Tag Mavens or User Yentas) to spend their time
> networking students with pre-existing online content, social scholars,
> and a demographically balanced mixed of like-minded students.  Salary:
> Gift Economy Karma/Linden
>
> Duties of the Link Jockey:
> No more office hours. No more lesson plans.  No more wrestling with
> students' dispersed attention spans.  (Google has already made them
> stoopid.  No need to make them angry, too.)  Link Jockeys will busy
> themselves:
>
> 1) Creating "syllabi" of entirely (Free) online content:
>             viral videos: Ted videos, youtube (Charlie Bit My Finger
> 101), videojug
>             sharable widgets
>             free readings
>             link lists
>             blog feeds
>
> 2) Connecting students with online mentors:
>            These social shirpas help students find scholars to
> "friend" and follow on Facebook, Twitter, and Social Bookmarking sites
>            Students rinse themselves in the streams of content
> regularly coursing forth from these web-springs.
>
> 3) Compiling lists of listservs and discussion forums for the students
> to join. (Toss those tired discussion starters.)  And if that's not
> enough interaction:
>
> 4) Assigning students into cohorts based on an interest survey (a la
> Friend Recommendation).  Collect them in Ning or Facebook groups
>
> 5) Compelling all "students" (--aren't we all students?--) to blog,
> bookmark, and Twitter so they are rebroadcasting their reflections and
> discoveries
>
> Wash, Rinse, Repeat.
>
> (Note by wiki-izing this process, the job tasks below could be
> crowdsourced -- or better yet re-distribute this job to the millions
> of users trying to register for adult content sites in the manner of
> Captcha.  Users could become passive micro-contributors to online
> education by correctly tagging, say, an LoC holding about
> globalization as either "international relations" or "global conquest"
> or "Web 2.0")
>
> Such a bold move would alleviate the troubles of grading, fretting
> over a particular class or student, or even finding a job in a down
> economy.
>
> You might be thinking: Does he mean online education like Open
> University? THE University of Phoenix?
>
> No, not at all.  I don't mean teachers would be paid to teach courses
> online, nor do I mean students attending online unis.  There would be
> no courses really and certainly no teaching in some old-fashioned,
> hegemonic, spoon-feeding, outline-following, learning-outcome sense.
> The goal is simple: make links with the hope that the students will
> begin to make their own.
>
> Aren't we awfully close?
>
> Would this really be so bad?
>
> I wonder.  I wondered aloud to those same students who were either
> text messaging weekend plans to their friends or Twittering my
> revolutionary proposal to the world.
>
> Thoughts?
> Mark
>
> --
> Writing Program
> University of Southern California
> http://WriterResponseTheory.org
> http://CriticalCodeStudies.com
> _______________________________________________
> iDC -- mailing list of the Institute for Distributed Creativity (
> distributedcreativity.org)
> iDC at mailman.thing.net
> https://mailman.thing.net/mailman/listinfo/idc
>
> List Archive:
> http://mailman.thing.net/pipermail/idc/
>
> iDC Photo Stream:
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/idcnetwork/
>
> RSS feed:
> http://rss.gmane.org/gmane.culture.media.idc
>
> iDC Chat on Facebook:
> http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2457237647
>
> Share relevant URLs on Del.icio.us by adding the tag iDCref
>

-- 
: http://augmentology.com
: http://knott404.blogspot.com
: http://netwurker.livejournal.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.thing.net/pipermail/idc/attachments/20090219/ef6e6371/attachment.htm 