[iDC] Comment on labor media and Iran
Jesse Drew
jdrew at ucdavis.edu
Tue Jun 23 21:23:46 UTC 2009
Dear Trebor and all,
I am really enjoying the discussion and debate unrolling here on this
list, and am quite surprised by the overlap between my own research
and that of the other participants. I have wanted to respond to many
of these posts and threads, and kept waiting for the time to add to
the discussion with something more complete than a quick response or
comment. Unfortunately, my addition to the list corresponded with my
two young kids getting released from school for summer! So, at this
point, I feel compelled to just jump in when I can.
As I mentioned in my introductory statement, I have been working on
communications practices by labor activists and concur with the
contributor who mentioned the importance of the communications of
global business, typically overlooked by media hype over personal
communications use. In tracing the contemporary development of global
labor communications, it is easy to see its counterpart in how the
telegraph helped colonialism develop into imperialism, how wireless
radio assisted United Fruit in creating the Central American banana
republics, and how modern computer networks facilitated the global
production line. These uses should be kept in mind when considering
the liberatory elements of labor activist communications and should
serve as reminders that all such technologies must be viewed as
contested terrain.
I often find much discussion of the relevance of social networking and
media tools still pegged to the familiar mode of traditional
broadcasting—how many eyes or ears a centralized message is reaching.
Those of us with past lives in other electronic community-building
ventures, such as in community access television or mini-FM radio,
know that it can often be more valuable to have shared communications
among small numbers, or horizontally between organizational
structures, rather than to reach a mass audience. As has been pointed
out on this list, not all of this needs to be of a communicative
nature, but could involve information and database sharing as well.
A union negotiator pointed out to me that being able to walk into the
room with a laptop and network connection and access the same
financial spreadsheets and databases as the corporate negotiator may
offer the largest advantage he has experienced from the new
communications technologies. Chemical workers have explained to me
how the power over worker health and safety has grown enormously once
chemical and hazardous substance databases began to be shared among
different unions around the world. Such seemingly banal or mundane
anecdotes are certainly not recognized to be as newsworthy as a
million tweets, but may signify far larger, more meaningful change.
Speaking of tweets, I can’t help but comment on the situation in Iran,
and the horrible situation confronted by Iranian democratic
activists. I believe like-minded people around the world must act in
unison to defend human rights and liberties there, as well as anywhere
such struggles arise. At the same time I have grown increasingly
annoyed by the armchair “tweeting” of many North American observers,
who urge the Iranians to confront the police and the militias. I
would make a wild guess that very few of them know what it is like to
face down a phalanx of riot police, while being gassed, maced and shot
at. This is a real flesh-and-blood struggle, not a virtual one. It
strikes me as another example of mediated experience being confused
with real experience, something I find epidemic in many young people
today. It particularly irks me because we had our own election fraud
here in the US just a few years ago, and allowed our own Supreme
(Court) Council to install their choice of president. The Americans
meekly accepted their fate and went about their business. I don’t
believe a single barricade went up in the aftermath of that stolen
election. This week I have seen several editorials and articles
taking credit on behalf of “western technology” for allowing the
Iranian rebellion to happen! Funny, I don’t recall seeing any mobile
phones attached to the Iranians when they overthrew the US-installed
Shah of Iran in 1978-79.
Looking forward to more discussion. Thanks,
Jesse Drew
Jesse Drew, Ph.D.
Director, Technocultural Studies
University of California at Davis
Art Building, Room 316
One Shields Avenue
Davis, CA 95616
530-752-9674
jdrew at ucdavis.edu
More information about the iDC
mailing list